Jiang, Y., Yang, C., Na, J., Li, G., Li, Y., Zhong, J.: “A Brief Review of Neural Networks based Learning and Control and their Applications for Robots,” 2017, pp 1–30. Automatica 28(6), 1083–1112 (1992)Ĭarrio, A., Sampedro, C., Rodriguez-Ramos, A., Campoy, P.: A review of deep learning methods and applications for unmanned aerial vehicles. Hunt, K.J., Sbarbaro, D., Żbikowski, R., Gawthrop, P.J.: Neural networks for control systems-a survey. Yip, P.P., Hedrick, J.K.: Adaptive dynamic surface control: a simplified algorithm for adaptive backstepping control of nonlinear systems. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp 2930–2937 (2016) 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp 1126–1131 (2014)Ĭhand, A.N., Kawanishi, M., Narikiyo, T.: Non-linear model-free control of flapping wing flying robot using ipid. Younes, Y.A., Drak, A., Noura, H.N., Rabhi, A., hajjaji, A.E.: Model-free control of a quadrotor vehicle. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, p 6687 (2006)įekri, S., Athans, M., Pascoal, A.: Issues, progress and new results in robust adaptive control (2006) Sadraey, M., Colgren, R.: Robust nonlinear controller design for a complete uav mission. PTR Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, vol. Ioannou, P.A., Sun, J.: Robust adaptive control. Tsakalis, K.S., Ioannou, P.A.: Linear time-varying systems: control and adaptation. Shamma, J.S., Cloutier, J.R.: Gain-scheduled missile autopilot design using linear parameter varying transformations. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp 1244–1250 (2018) 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp 243–249 (2018)Ĭonyers, S.A., Rutherford, M.J., Valavanis, K.P.: An empirical evaluation of ground effect for small-scale rotorcraft. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, p 6461 (2007)Ĭonyers, S.A., Rutherford, M.J., Valavanis, K.P.: An empirical evaluation of ceiling effect for small-scale rotorcraft*. Hoffmann, G., Huang, H., Waslander, S., Tomlin, C.: Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: Theory and experiment. Prouty, R.W.: Helicopter performance, stability, and control (1986) Santoso, F., Garratt, M.A., Anavatti, S.G.: State-of-the-art intelligent flight control systems in unmanned aerial vehicles. Raffo, G.V., Ortega, M.G., Rubio, F.R.: An underactuated h infinity control strategy for a quadrotor helicopter. Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 4957–4962 (2006)ĭas, A., Lewis, F.L., Subbarao, K.: Backstepping approach for controlling a quadrotor using lagrange form dynamics. Xu, R., Ozguner, U.: Sliding mode control of a quadrotor helicopter. 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED’10, pp 1461–1466 (2010) Mechatronics 21(6), 927–938 (2011)Īlexis, K., Nikolakopoulos, G., Tzes, A.: Experimental model predictive attitude tracking control of a quadrotor helicopter subject to wind-gusts. Nicol, C., Macnab, C.J.B., Ramirez-Serrano, A.: Robust adaptive control of a quadrotor helicopter. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, pp 1–6 (2009) Voos, H.: Nonlinear control of a quadrotor micro-uav using feedback-linearization. The end-result offers supported information for advantages, disadvantages and applicability of a family of relevant controllers to UAV prototypes. A reference template is used throughout the survey as a common basis for comparative studies to fairly determine capabilities and limitations of existing research. The objective is to pave the way and establish a foundation for efficient controller designs with performance guarantees. Viewed from this perspective, this survey provides a comprehensive literature review on combined MBC-ANN techniques that are suitable for UAV flight control, i.e., low-level control. These two challenges may be mitigated by Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) that have been widely studied due to their unique features and advantages in system identification and controller design. Despite their success, MBC-based designs rely heavily on the accuracy of the mathematical model of the real plant and they suffer from the explosion of complexity problem. Model-Based Control (MBC) techniques have dominated flight controller designs for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).